In the pantheon of Australian cricket, few names resonate with the same intensity as Pat Cummins and Mitchell Starc. Both have been instrumental in Australia’s bowling attack, bringing a blend of pace, swing, and sheer competitiveness to the Test arena. But when we dive into the stats, who emerges as the better Test bowler?
The Numbers Game
Starting with the basics, Mitchell Starc has played more Test matches than Pat Cummins, with 94 appearances compared to Cummins’ 67. This difference in matches played naturally leads to more opportunities for wickets, and Starc has capitalized on this, amassing 376 wickets to Cummins’ 294. However, the quantity of wickets doesn’t tell the whole story; the efficiency and economy with which they are taken do.
Economy and Average
Pat Cummins boasts a significantly better bowling average in Tests, standing at 22.43 compared to Starc’s 27.78. This average suggests that Cummins has been more effective at dismissing batsmen while conceding fewer runs. Additionally, Cummins’ economy rate is notably lower at 2.90 runs per over, against Starc’s 3.41, highlighting his ability to keep the runs down even on flat tracks or against aggressive batting line-ups.
Strike Rate and Impact
When it comes to strike rate, Cummins again holds an edge, taking a wicket every 46.3 balls compared to Starc’s 48.7. This indicates that Cummins has a knack for breaking partnerships quicker, which can be crucial in Test cricket where a single session can shift the game’s momentum. However, Starc’s ability to take wickets at a slightly slower but still impressive rate shows his prowess, particularly with his natural ability to swing the ball both ways.
Best Bowling Figures
Both bowlers have had moments where they’ve turned games on their head with their bowling. Cummins’ best figures in an innings are 6/23, and in a match, he has 10/62. Starc, on the other hand, has slightly better figures with 6/48 in an innings and an impressive 11/94 in a match. These figures reveal that while Starc might occasionally outperform Cummins in sheer numbers, Cummins tends to do so with greater consistency over time.
Consistency and Durability
Cummins’ career has been marked by a remarkable return to Test cricket after a long absence due to injuries, demonstrating not just skill but also resilience and durability. His consistent availability in recent years has been vital for Australia, especially in critical series. Starc, while also durable, has had his share of battles with form and fitness, although his performances in pivotal matches, particularly in the subcontinent, have been game-changing.
The Art of Bowling
Starc brings an element of intimidation with his height, pace, and the left-arm angle that can trouble right-handers, often leading to spectacular dismissals. His ability to extract bounce and swing, especially with the new ball, has made him a potent weapon. Cummins, with a slightly lower average speed but masterful control over line and length, has more of a metronomic approach, wearing down batsmen with his accuracy and the occasional burst of pace.
Milestones and Achievements
Both bowlers have achieved significant milestones; Starc has crossed the 300-wicket mark in Tests, a feat Cummins is on track to surpass. They’ve both been part of Ashes-winning teams, World Test Championship victories, and have individual accolades like Player of the Series in various Test series. Their contributions have often been decisive, with Cummins’ leadership as captain adding another layer to his cricketing resume.
The Role in the Team
Starc often serves as the attacking option, aiming to take wickets from the outset, sometimes at the expense of economy. Cummins, while also an attacking bowler, is seen as a more balanced one, capable of both holding an end and taking crucial wickets. His role has evolved into that of a captain, where his tactical acumen on the field complements his bowling skills.
Who Comes Out on Top?
Comparing stats between Pat Cummins and Starc is like comparing two different types of wine; each has its unique flavor and appeal. While Starc’s raw numbers are higher due to more matches played, Cummins’ superior average, economy, and strike rate suggest he’s been the more effective bowler per game. However, Starc’s ability to turn games with his bowling, especially in conditions favorable to swing and seam, cannot be underestimated.
In the end, both have been pivotal in Australia’s success in Test cricket, each bringing something unique to the table. If we were to crown a winner based solely on stats, Pat Cummins might edge out Mitchell Starc due to his efficiency metrics. Yet, in the grand narrative of Test cricket, both are champions in their own right, their legacies intertwined in the fabric of Australian cricket’s rich history.